I Thought Music Teachers Had to Stand at the Center of the Room
The Only Model I Knew
One thing I have been thinking about lately is how much our early experiences in music shape what we believe teaching is supposed to look like. For most of my life, the only model of music teaching I really saw was teacher-centered. The band director stood at the front of the room, on the podium, leading everything. They gave instructions, controlled the pace, made the decisions, corrected mistakes, and everyone else followed. That was simply what “music teaching” looked like to me.
I do not remember seeing many examples of music teachers acting more as facilitators, designers, collaborators, or guides. I did not see classrooms where students had large amounts of ownership, creative control, or decision-making power. I mostly saw the traditional ensemble model where the teacher was clearly the center of the environment.
What is interesting to me now is that even though I admired those teachers and wanted to become one, I never felt completely comfortable in that role myself.
Standing on the Podium
I still remember the first time I stepped on a podium in front of my high school band. I remember the feeling of everyone looking at me. I remember feeling exposed and nervous. At the time, I honestly thought there was something wrong with me because I assumed that if you were truly meant to become a band director or music teacher, you were supposed to naturally enjoy standing at the center of the room. You were supposed to feel confident and energized by that level of visibility and authority. I also thought you were supposed to have this endless mental file cabinet of jokes and quick comments ready at any moment, almost like part of the job was being an entertainer as much as a teacher.
But I did not.
What complicates this memory is that I also really wanted to lead. I wanted to be drum major. I wanted to direct. I wanted to shape musical experiences. I loved music deeply, and I loved being part of musical groups. I wanted to contribute to that world in a meaningful way. Yet at the same time, the highly teacher-centered aspect of conducting and directing never felt entirely natural to me.
For a long time, I interpreted that discomfort as weakness.
I thought maybe I was not built correctly for the profession. Maybe I was too introverted. Maybe I lacked the charisma or commanding personality that I associated with great band directors.
I think many people would probably find this surprising now because over the years I have directed marching bands, taught at the university level, conducted ensembles, spoken publicly, led workshops, and even given a TEDx talk. From the outside, it probably appears that I am very comfortable being the center of attention.
And in some ways, I have become more comfortable over time.
Learning the Skill Without Becoming the Identity
I think there is an important distinction between becoming more capable in teacher-centered environments and believing that teacher-centered instruction is the only or best way to teach.
Those are not the same thing.
I learned how to conduct. I learned how to rehearse groups. I learned how to project confidence. I learned how to lead ensembles publicly. Like many teachers, I practiced those skills repeatedly over time. Conducting and directing are performative skills in many ways. The confidence people see in experienced directors is often not simply natural personality. It is developed through repetition, experience, preparation, and adaptation.
But even as I became more skilled at those things, I never stopped feeling drawn toward a different vision of teaching.
Teaching Exists on a Spectrum
Over time, I began realizing that teaching does not have to exist entirely in the teacher-centered model I inherited. Teaching exists on a spectrum. Some environments are highly teacher-directed. Others are highly learner-centered. Most probably move back and forth depending on the goals, the students, the context, and the type of learning taking place.
That realization was incredibly freeing for me because it helped me understand that there was never something “wrong” with me. I was simply responding honestly to a model of teaching that did not fully align with how I naturally related to people and learning.
I think this realization also helped shape many of the philosophies that now guide my work in music education.
I became increasingly interested in learner-centered teaching, facilitation, creativity, participation, and shared ownership in music classrooms. I became interested in designing experiences rather than controlling every moment within them. Instead of seeing the teacher as the permanent center of the environment, I became interested in how teachers could create spaces where students connect with music, with each other, and with themselves.
Discomfort as a Clue
I think that shift happened partly because I understood what it felt like to be uncomfortable under constant visibility and evaluation.
When you spend your life in highly performance-oriented environments, you begin noticing how many students feel anxious, invisible, exposed, or uncertain. Some students thrive in highly directed systems. Others withdraw from them. Some students are deeply musical but do not necessarily feel comfortable in environments where there is only one right answer, one leader, one pathway, or one definition of success.
I think my own discomfort helped me become more sensitive to that. Ironically, the thing I once saw as weakness may have actually shaped my strengths as a teacher.
I do not think my greatest strength is standing at the center of a room commanding attention. My strength is probably designing spaces where students feel safe enough to contribute, experiment, create, participate, and belong. I care deeply about helping students experience meaningful music-making rather than simply reproducing correct performances.
Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Are Not Enemies
This does not mean teacher-centered teaching is bad.
I think that is another important realization I have had over time. Earlier in my career, I probably viewed learner-centered teaching and teacher-centered teaching as opposites competing against each other. Now I see them more as tools or positions along a continuum.
There are absolutely moments when students need clear direction, modeling, structure, leadership, and expertise. There are moments when direct instruction is necessary and valuable. There are moments where standing on the podium and guiding a large group toward a shared goal matters deeply.
But there are also moments where students need ownership. They need space to make decisions, collaborate, solve problems, take risks, and shape musical experiences themselves.
The important thing is recognizing that teachers are allowed to move across that spectrum rather than becoming trapped inside a single inherited identity.
There Are Many Ways to Lead
I think many music teachers unconsciously teach the way they were taught because they assume that is simply what music teaching is. If all you ever see are podium-centered models, you may begin believing that being a music teacher requires becoming the authority figure at the center of the room. And if you do not naturally fit that personality type, you may quietly convince yourself that you are not meant for teaching.
I wish more future teachers understood that there are many ways to lead musical experiences.
You can lead from the podium.
You can lead from inside the ensemble.
You can lead by facilitating.
You can lead by designing.
You can lead by supporting.
You can lead by listening.
Leadership does not always have to look like control.
Becoming the Teacher I Actually Am
In many ways, I think my professional journey has been about slowly giving myself permission to become the kind of teacher I actually am rather than the kind of teacher I thought I was supposed to become.
And strangely enough, the more I embraced that, the more confident I became.
Not because I became the stereotypical commanding director at the center of the room, but because I finally realized I did not have to be.